OverviewTeaching: 10 min
Exercises: 0 minQuestions
What is the difference between a build system and a build system generator?Objectives
Learn about build systems and build system generators.
Understand why CMake is used.
Newer CMake is better.
Building code is hard. You need long commands to build each part of your code; and you need do to this on many parts of your code.
So people came up with Build Systems; these had ways set up dependencies (such as file A needs
to be built to build file B), and ways to store the commands used to build each file or type of
file. These are language independent (mostly), allowing you to setup builds of almost anything; you
make to build LaTeX documents if you wish. Some common build systems include make (the
classic pervasive one), ninja (a newer one from Google designed in the age of build system
generators), and rake (Ruby make, nice syntax for Ruby users).
However, this is:
- Mostly hand coded: You have to know all the proper commands
- Platform/compiler dependent: You have to build the commands for each compiler.
- Not aware of dependencies: If you require a library, you have to handle the paths, etc.
- Hard to extend; if you want to use an IDE instead, good luck.
Enter Build System Generators (hereby labeled BSGs for brevity). These understand the concepts of your programming language build; they usually support common compilers, languages, libraries, and output formats. These usually write a build system (or IDE) file and then let that do the actually build. The most popular BSG is CMake, which stands for Cross-platform Make. But as we’ve just shown, it is not really in the same category as make. Other BSGs include Bazel (by Google), SCons (older Python system), Meson (very young Python system), and a few others. But CMake has unparalleled support by IDEs, libraries, and compilers.
Note that both CMake and Make are custom languages rather than being built in an existing language, like rake and SCons, etc. While it is nice to consolidate languages, the requirement that you have an external language installed and configured was too high for any of these to catch on for general use.
To recap, you should use CMake if:
- You want to avoid hard-coding paths
- You need to build a package on more than one computer
- You want to use CI (continuous integration)
- You need to support different OSs (maybe even just flavors of Unix)
- You want to support multiple compilers
- You want to use an IDE, but maybe not all of the time
- You want to describe how your program is structured logically, not flags and commands
- You want to use a library
- You want to use tools, like Clang-Tidy, to help you code
- You want to use a debugger
(More) Modern CMake
CMake has really changed dramatically since it was introduced around 2000. And, by the time of 2.8, it was available in lots of Linux Distribution package managers. However, this means there often are really old versions of CMake “available by default” in your environment. Please, please upgrade and design for newer CMake. No one likes writing or debugging build systems. Using a newer version can cut your build system code in less than half, reduce bugs, integrate better with external dependents, and more. Installing CMake can be as little as one line, and doesn’t require sudo access. See more info here.
Somehow, this is difficult to understand, so I’ll shout it to make it clearer. Writing Modern CMake reduces your chances of build problems. The tools CMake provides are better than the ones you will try to write yourself. CMake works with more compilers, in more situations, than you do. So if you try to add a flag, you’ll likely get it wrong for some compilers or OSs, but if you can use a tool CMake gives you instead, then that’s CMake’s business to get right and not yours.
It’s not a big deal to install a newer CMake. The issues people open for “this is broken” far outnumber the issues people open because you required a CMake newer than they want to run (I think I’ve only seen one of those, and they came around when they saw the feature they would have to give up).
Example of Modern CMake
Bad 2.8 style CMake: Adding a C++11 flag manually. This is compiler specific, is different for CUDA, and locks in a set version, rather than a minimum version.
If you require CMake 3.1+, you can set
CXX_STANDARD, but only on a final target.
If you require CMake 3.8+, you can just use
compile_featuresto set a minimium feature level you require, and all targets using yours will get at least that level set on them!
There are some other places to find good information on the web. Here are some of them:
- Modern CMake: The book this tutorial derives from.
- The official help: Really amazing documentation. Nicely organized, great search, and you can toggle versions at the top. It just doesn’t have a great “best practices tutorial”, which is what this book tries to fill in.
- Effective Modern CMake: A great list of do’s and don’ts.
- Embracing Modern CMake: A post with good description of the term
- It’s time to do CMake Right: A nice set of best practices for Modern CMake projects.
- The Ultimate Guide to Modern CMake: A slightly dated post with similar intent.
- More Modern CMake: A great presentation from Meeting C++ 2018 that recommends CMake 3.12+. This talk makes calls CMake 3.0+ “Modern CMake” and CMake 3.12+ “More Modern CMake”.
- toeb/moderncmake: A nice presentation and examples about CMake 3.5+, with intro to syntax through project organization
Build systems describe exactly how to build targets.
Build system generators describe general relationships.
Modern CMake is simpler and reduces the chance of build problems.